# GIP-68/69/70/71/72: Multi-Proposal Announcing Goldfinch V3 **URL:** \ **Category:** Proposals\ **Created:** [July 10, 2024, 1:29am UTC](https://gov.goldfinch.finance/t/gip-68-69-70-71-72-multi-proposal-announcing-goldfinch-v3/2022 "2024-07-10T01:29:07Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 10
**Author:** ![blakewest](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/94ad74/32.png) [@blakewest](https://gov.goldfinch.finance/u/blakewest)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 11:56pm UTC](https://gov.goldfinch.finance/t/gip-68-69-70-71-72-multi-proposal-announcing-goldfinch-v3/2022/10 "2024-07-15T23:56:26Z")
Hey @Herve, I think just to clarify, this _is_ about building the MVP, but for a different product. There is the existing Goldfinch pool, which was about getting investors and connecting them with deals and fund managers (I think that’s what you’re referencing?). And then there is the infrastructure product, which is about getting RWA teams in DeFi to build on the underlying infrastructure that powers Goldfinch and Heron right now. That was what the [Blueprint](https://gov.goldfinch.finance/t/grc-02-a-blueprint-for-goldfinch/1881/4) outlined last year. This proposal is about helping to realize that more fully. It’s about having Obinna do things like talk to RWA teams to better understand their needs and then use the budget to help the community build that MVP so other teams can really start using it. It could be used also to encourage teams to build on it, but I agree we shouldn’t go out the gates with heavy incentives before there is a solid infrastructure product that people are actually using. Heavy incentives can confuse product market fit otherwise. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.goldfinch.finance/t/gip-68-69-70-71-72-multi-proposal-announcing-goldfinch-v3/2022)._