GIP-74: Retain Gavin / Solmonese to help manage the legacy Goldfinch-tokenized loans

Author : @Obinna

Summary
To help manage risk for all Goldfinch tokenized loans and investments and to maximize the community’s recovery efforts in the ongoing process with Lend East, I propose that the Goldfinch community retain Ted Gavin of Gavin / Solmonese (the “Advisor”). This proposal extends GIP-65, where the community previously hired an advisor to help manage the portfolio.

Why is this Necessary?
Goldfinch needs a centralized entity to represent the interests of both the Senior Pool and Backers (collectively, the “Lenders”) when interacting with borrowers. This centralized approach will ensure:

  • A single risk manager is communicating with all borrowers on behalf of Lenders.
  • Borrowers comply with their obligations, including reporting, to promote transparency.
  • Efficient management of the recovery process with Lend East, as well as any future recovery efforts.

About Gavin / Solmonese
Gavin / Solmonese is a leading corporate recovery and restructuring firm in the U.S. Ted Gavin, Managing Director and Founding Partner, will lead this engagement. Ted is a Certified Turnaround Professional and a Nationally Certified Professional Mediator with a wealth of experience in managing complex financial situations, including corporate bankruptcies and recovery efforts.

Ted’s experience spans business liquidations, creditor negotiations, and post-bankruptcy liquidating trusts. His previous leadership roles, including as President of the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI), and his ability to streamline creditor-debtor communication, make him a strong fit for Goldfinch’s needs.

Ted is already familiar with the Goldfinch protocol and community, which will reduce the time needed to onboard him and his team.

Responsibilities :
As in GIP-65, by retaining the Advisor, the Lenders associated with the Borrowers authorize the Advisor to take such action on such Lender’s behalf and to exercise such powers, rights and remedies under the respective documents by and among Lender and Borrower as are granted to such Lender by the terms thereof, together with such powers, rights and remedies as are reasonably incidental thereto. Advisor may exercise such powers, rights, and remedies and perform such duties by or through its agents, sub-agents, employees, or attorneys-in-fact. Advisor shall not have, by reason hereof or any of the other documents, a fiduciary relationship in respect of any Lender. Without limiting the foregoing, Advisor is authorized to:

  1. file any financing or continuation statements or record any documents or instruments in any public office at any time or times or otherwise perfect any security interest for the benefit of Lender and other secured parties;
  2. monitor and preserve the collateral;
  3. make information requests to Borrower;
  4. deliver notices of default and/or event of default to Borrower and negotiate forbearance agreements and waivers in connection therewith; and,
  5. to the extent available under applicable law and the terms of the documents, take remedial action against Borrower and the collateral such as initiating litigation, conducting foreclosures, and sweeping cash.

In addition, this Advisor will be responsible for providing regular updates to the community and will serve as the main point of contact for all Lenders regarding actions and remedies related to the Borrowers. Immediately following the approval of this proposal, this community-retained Advisor will be reaching out to the community to establish best practices for all Lender-Borrower communications going forward, including but not limited to how risk updates will be provided.

How Will This Differ from GIP-65? :
The engagement under GIP-65 fell short of expectations, but we believe this new arrangement will be significantly more effective for the following reasons:

  1. Experienced Firm: This time, we are engaging a reputable firm with a long track record risk management and complex recovery processes for lenders. In addition to Ted Gavin, we will have access to his team of professionals to assist with Borrower interactions and Lender communications.
  2. Community Oversight and Advocacy: To further ensure the community’s interests are well represented, we propose appointing community advocates to work closely with Gavin / Solmonese and facilitate direct feedback from Lenders. This will include Warbler Labs and potentially other members of the community.

Budget
Gavin / Solmonese operates on an hourly basis. Below are the estimated hourly rates for their services:

  • Senior & Managing Directors: $500 to $850
  • Senior Consultants & Directors: $225 to $550
  • Other professional staff: $125 to $250

Based on the expected workload, we anticipate a monthly bill of around $50,000 plus potential legal fees at the onset. This could vary depending on the complexity and amount of work needed to manage risk and handle recoveries on behalf of the community, but we expect this to generally trend downwards as the Advisor gets ramped up and more familiar with the various Borrowers.

Benefits
By retaining Gavin / Solmonese, we will:

  1. Improve the management of Goldfinch’s portfolio of outstanding loans.
  2. Ensure clearer, more efficient communication between Lenders and Borrowers.
  3. Maximize recovery efforts related to the Lend East pool, minimizing the potential for additional losses.

Downside
The engagement is relatively costly, with estimated fees of $50,000 per month to start. However this will cover all active pools on Goldfinch, and we believe the potential benefit of better portfolio management and more effective recovery efforts outweigh the cost.

Voting
“Yes” - Retain Ted Gavin of Gavin / Solmonese and use treasury funds to compensate the Advisor.

“No” – Maintain the current portfolio management setup without engaging Gavin / Solmonese.

This proposal aims to help protect the interests of the entire Goldfinch community and promote long-term sustainability through stronger risk management and recovery processes. We encourage everyone to weigh the benefits and vote accordingly.

1 Like

My vote is YES.

Retain Ted Gavin of Gavin / Solmonese and use treasury funds to compensate the Advisor.

Hi guys, can you clarify, under this new agreement

  • What is the legal process / rights for Gavin/Solmonese to settle on behalf of the backers? What happen if some backers reject the settlement proposed (if any)?
  • How do you manage the conflicts of interest regarding the settlement negotiation between Senior lenders and backers?

Can you also give some color about the shortcomings you have identified re. previous advisor (Ajay) so that we can understand what gaps we are trying to fill?

1 Like

My vote is YES. Needed

Though it’s a pity that the previous advisor left after such a short period of time and showed almost no progress, I still support this proposal. Fingers crossed that this time things will be done more professionally, with greater transparency for the whole community, and more quickly.

I support this proposal. This firm is clearly highly experienced (their website speaks to this) and will bring a heightened level of expertise to manage all borrowers.

Plus 1. I support this as well, as I think it will be a real upgrade.

I support this! Hopefully this advisor delivers better than the previous one.

support this. Retain Ted Gavin of Gavin / Solmonese and use treasury funds to compensate the Advisor.

Yes I agree!
We need someone to guide us in a professionally way.
We need a solution to our problem and an advisor with such experience with exactly what we need! It takes money to make money.

I support this proposal & vote YES.

Retain Ted Gavin of Gavin / Solmonese and use treasury funds to compensate the Advisor.

An advisor is truly necessary to resolve issues with legacy loans.

Self-nomination of @Antoine for GIP-65 seems to me to be a pretty good decision. Not least because he has a vested interest (he is a member of the pools).

At the same time, I support the candidacy proposed by the Goldfinch/Warbler team, so I am ready to vote “YES”.

I say yes to the addition of Gavin/Solmonese. I believe this addition will strengthen the team and is an essential piece for growth moving forward

Thank you for supporting my candidacy. I truly appreciate it. And indeed having c.USD750k at stake of my own money stuck in Junior and Senior buckets gives me a strong personal motivation to get the job done.

I am generally in favor of having a strong, committed team to address the outstanding loans, as I believe this is the most crucial task for maintaining the protocol’s credibility. The current approach has not been effective, so if the community feels I am a better candidate than Gavin/Solmonese, or if collaborating with them as a team is beneficial, I am open to both options.

I have two concerns regarding Gavin/Solmonese’s proposal:

  1. Fee Structure: Gavin/Solmonese should have a fee cap or receive part of their compensation as a success fee rather than an hourly fee. Without this, there is a risk that their incentive might lean towards choosing the most costly process instead of the most effective one. With over 10 years of experience dealing with legal advisors in complex situations, I have found that hourly billing, especially if not closely monitored, can escalate without yielding proper results due to misaligned incentives.
  2. Transparency: I would like to see transparency regarding the mandate given to Gavin/Solmonese, considering the differing incentives for Senior and Junior lenders.

Thank you once again for your support. I look forward to discussing this further.

I support this proposal and vote YES

I support this GIP, hoping that everything goes well.

// Yes.

I like your idea re fee structure. Curious to hear @Obinna , @mikesall and @blakewest thoughts on it

In any case we need change and having more resources for collection is better than the status quo. I also support this propoal.