Definitely Yes. Thanks to Blake for the updated proposal.
1 Like
Да, полностью поддерживаю это предложение
Thanks Blake and Mike for this quick proposal! Appreciate your efforts and quick turnaround to keep this going! Thank you!
Even though I see what you have done in the proposal with the numbers (mixing backer liquidity mining with retroactive rewards (while LPs received 4% purely in retroactive rewards) which bumped up the APY to 200% than actual 160%, and having a cap to please small investors while robbing the medium to large investors. Medium to Large investors are getting almost 60% less tokens than what they would’ve got without cap), I still vote “Yes” to your proposal. Because, though I am a Capitalist in my brain, I am a Socialist at heart 
Anyway, good job! Very Intelligent way to satisfy majority of the community! But beware, socialism is a slippery slope haha 
2 Likes
Yes - this proposal is ok with me
1 Like
“Yes”. This approach seems fair to all participants in the protocol.
1 Like
What about the participants that invested less than $750? Will they get a capped reward too?
1 Like
(post deleted by author)
(post deleted by author)
Yes what @nisa said is how it would work. That approach is also what is shown in the spreadsheet.
1 Like
When this will be distributed? at least approximately, like days or weeks? Thank you.
1 Like
Similar to LP’s - up to 750$ and then proportional to amount contributed to more than 750$.
1 Like
Yes. Thank you for your work.
1 Like
Yes - But I would like to see something that accounts for HOW many backer pools you contributed to. As you state above, time/risk/effort - someone who contributed to multiple pools should have that factored in the ‘risk bonus multiplier’
1 Like
“Yes”. Thanks for the great work!
1 Like
Fully Support this proposal
1 Like
“Yes”
I fully support this proposal, recognizing smaller deposits is a nice touch
2 Likes
Definitely Yes. Thank you in advance
2 Likes
Thanks! I support this proposal.
I say YES to this proposal
“Yes” I support this proposal.