Senior Pool. Snapshot December 14

Proposals
1 
        Many members of the community were among the first who believed in the project even before the start of Goldfinch Flight Academy, saw its potential and contributed money to the Senior pool. But for various reasons, they were withdrawn until December 14, when there was a snapshot and, as a result, they did not receive any rewards, despite the fact that for several months they filled the liquidity pool with significant amounts. 
        I propose distribute part of the reward between these people based on the amounts they contributed to the liquidity pool and the period for providing liquidity to the pool. Or the second option is to postpone the snapshot to an earlier period. There is a history of transactions and it is not difficult to do, anyone can provide data. 
        It would be fair and deservedI hope for your understanding.

Thank you for understanding

10 Likes
3

Yeep, I fully agree with author.

3 Likes
4

I totally agree.

I provided liquidity for 40k or so for 3 months then i withdrew some USDC and then added it back at the end of december after a month or so… so snapshot only took into consideration my 10k… but if a person provided liquidity for two days in december… he had a better deal than me providiting 40k for 3 or 4 months in total.

4 Likes
5

Fully agree. Some people staked for a long time and got nothing(

4 Likes
6

I agree. I kept usdс in the pool for about 3 months, but withdrew a few days before the snapshot. We can say that it was a just little unlucky, but it would be fair to award partially to those who withdrew a little earlier

3 Likes
7

I support you, completely incomprehensible unfair decision, everywhere it was said that it is stimulated by additional tokens GFI and implied that if there will be a airdrop, then all and depending on the time and amount. So many opportunities to make more money in the peak market in these 2 months, but no we are not loyal according to GFI and not worthy of anything, thank you :frowning:

2 Likes
8

Leaving early supporters overboard seems unfair. It could be really great to have them rewarded based not only on sum of their investment, but also based on the time period tokens were in senior pool. Some people may be needed money for some urgent situations and couldn’t keep it until the airdrop time.

I didn’t invested in Senior Pool personally, so that’s just opinion of a party without a personal interest.

3 Likes
9

I would like commend this proposal. Community who added liquidity to Senior Pool should be awarded based on time they lock their funds. There could be various reasons why funds were withdrawn before snapshot on 14 DEC but we cannot deny the fact that this people contributed on early stage of Goldfinch and made a valuable impact to the Senior Pool liquidity even they missed snapshot.

Hoping Goldfinch DAO to make a right and fair decision regarding this matter.

2 Likes
10

Yup, time providing liquidity should be important. (and there were people a long before me, just sounds fair this way)

1 Like
11

Because now it may look like an insider game… people in the know deposited for a few days in december and got it better than us providing liquidity for 3-5 months…

12

English:
Firstly, if you invested in Senior Pool for % Apy, you got them, as you say - you believed in the project, didn’t you? What is the injustice in this case - you were paid for providing liquidity, just paid not as much as you would like?) The snapshot date could be absolutely any, earlier or later, and they would still be dissatisfied.
Secondly, it’s good after the fact, knowing the price and the fact that the drop for early participation was immediately unlocked - ask to change the date in your direction.
Thirdly, if you are a Bounty hunter and put in the Pool solely for the sake of a drop, why did you pull out funds from there? Blame yourself for this. Fourthly, the funds that you are asking to allocate should clearly not be spent on “shifting” the date, it is better to give them to those who, for some reason, did not make it to the table, although they made a great contribution and participation in the life of the academy. Looking forward to vote goverance.
Fifth, if someone still supports this crazy idea, I hope the tokens will be blocked with a linear unlock for two years, so as not to put pressure on the market price. And they will support the same Bounty hunters like him, look at his posts in Discord - SerjLug2020#0032, there doesn’t even smell of faith in the project, the person does not deny that he was trying to stigmatize the drop exclusively.

Русский:

Во-первых, если вы инвестировали в Senior Pool ради % Apy, вы их получили, как вы говорите - вы же верили в проект? В чем в данном случае заключается несправедливость - вам же заплатили за предоставление ликвидности, просто заплатили не столько сколько вы хотели бы?) Дата snapshot могла быть абсолютно любой, что раньше, что позже и все равно были бы недовольные.
Во-вторых, хорошо постфактум, зная цену и то что дроп за раннее участие был сразу разблокирован - просить изменить дату в вашу сторону.
В-третьих, если вы Bounty hunter и клали в Pool исключительно ради дропа, зачем выдергивали оттуда средства? Вините в этом только себя.
В-четвертых, средства которые вы просите выделить, явно не стоит тратить на «смещение» даты, лучше их выдать тем, кто по каким-то причинам не попал в таблицу, хотя внесли большой вклад и участие в жизни академии. Ждем goverance голосования.
В-пятых, если все же кто-то поддержит эту сумасшедшую идею, я надеюсь токены будут заблокированы с линеным разлоком на два года, дабы не давить на рыночную цену. А поддержат такие же Bounty hunter как он, посмотрите на его посты в discord - SerjLug2020#0032, там никакой верой в проект даже не пахнет, человек не отрицает что пытался заклеймить исключительно дроп.

UPD: Maybe, we will move the date for those who have withdrawn liquidity on December 12, 11, 10? Or March 9th? So that there were no offended ones?

4 Likes
13

If someone invested for APY, then it’s stupid, because APY was 3-5%))) This discussion is about the Senior pool, not about Flight Academy. These are different things))

1 Like
14

So let’s write it down, invested for the sake of an airdrop, took out the money myself before the snapshot, and investing for the sake of APY is stupid.
Once again I am convinced that Goldfinch DAO did everything right and did not allow bounty hunters to win this game.

3 Likes
15

Of course, investing without insurance on APY (3-5%) is stupid))) You can write it down)))
But this is a worthwhile risk if there is hope for additional rewards in the future.

16

personally, my opinion is, if you threw it for the sake of reward, then why did you bring it out? I would have kept it until the last… It’s just your problem. I read the posts in discord, except for the academy, I didn’t write anything, and I started writing only after I didn’t get a drop. your behavior only proves that airdrop hunter. I’m against it

2 Likes
17

Totally agree with proposal. Held fund in Senior pool near 3 month and withdrew a few days before snapshot. I’m upset(

1 Like
18

The same situation(((

19

1
1791×783 40.2 KB

2
2844×476 15.4 KB

lol, Our contribution to Goldfinch is acknowledged and deservedly rewarded.

1 Like
20

Therefore, if you took this risk, in the hope of receiving additional rewards, it was not worth withdrawing the investment to the end. The author of the topic is an offended bounty hunter, who has now decided to arrange a hunt for ghosts, in the discord he proved this openly. As the person above wrote - if you got them ahead of time, these are your problems.
In similar projects, there were absolutely 1 in 1 similar cases when people extracted funds ahead of time. Well, what to do, now just experience FOMO.
If you are ready to submit an offer prepared according to a template, with fully detailed mathematics for calculating the reward, taking into account the time spent in the pool, and not by the date of the snapshot - please, I will probably even support it, but in fact it had to be done before the distribution of the drop. Now, if you give you tokens without a linear unlock, you will simply kill the value of the rewards and you will absolutely not care about other members of the project, like me, who are not going to pour into a glass.

2 Likes
21

Agree! Could you please use earlier snapshot?

1 Like