Senior Pool. Snapshot December 14

Stop, I already told you everything I thought, you completely ignore all the facts. You just cry and beg for something to be given to you.
Typical abuser and bounty hunter.

3 Likes

It’s sad to watch when a person has so many complexes. Have a nice day!

Hey, you’ve given your verdict on the topic already and so has many other people. Now please stop trying to impose your point on other people here and start respecting other people’s opinions too.

100%. I provided liquidity for long period and withdraw when needed money so it’s not fair for people the date of snapshot which was decided

1 Like

I absolutely support the author. Was also a liquidity provider for 3 months and got nothing. I think there was just a rat on the team who came up with a one day snapshot and took advantage of this insider information. You can’t build a big and serious project on a background like that, and it’s not fair for Real Early Adopters.

1 Like

Totally agree. I suggest airdropping tokens to early supporters, who withdraw before 14 December
I provided around 45k$ in this pool, got tier 4 in Academy and all i have now is 1500 tokens which is the same as if I only provided 2k$ of liquidity for 1 day. I suppose I am on a different level of supporting Goldfinch and I dedicated a big amount of time to it, so please review this.

I think early providers should be rewarded, but only those who had significant periods of steaking before the snapshot.
For example: those who had an uninterrupted stacking period of at least $750 for two months between pool opening and December 14, but did not stack at the time of the snapshot

Guys, it smells like discrimination! This is immoral!

This is the most dishonest airdrop I’ve ever seen. Of course, tokens must be distributed to everyone who interacted with the protocol.
Personally, I had a total of 60,000 thousand dollars on my account and on my wife’s account from September to November. We didn’t get anything but a fee for leaving the pool.
It’s just not fair.

It`s very fair proposal

I’m against it. Who withdrew money from the pool before December 14 is their problem, but not the team’s! You willingly put money in the pool, didn’t you? That’s right. What claims can there be?

2 Likes

I think this is the right suggestion, since depositing liquidity at the very beginning is the most risky decision and it should be rewarded, since people believed in the project and showed their trust when few others did it. I hope the team and community will appreciate it

Just because they didn’t “keep” them until December 14th doesn’t make their contribution zero

Thanks for putting together this proposal.
I understand there are bunch of folks on this boat and missed the retro rewards.
One of the thing I think which is very key that is missing is - we need the data on how many people we are talking about, amounts they contributed and what amount of GFI are you proposing to be rewarded. Would be great if you can add that additional data.

Agree. I think we have to do it

What’s the team thinking about it? Or nothing?

maybe ignored
I’d rather not expect

Still no news about it?
No answer from devs?

Hi all,

As a reminder, please strictly follow the Governance Guide for the formatting of the proposal. Any proposal which does not follow the guidelines will not be entertained by the community.

I would encourage the community members to draft a better-structured proposal and lean on @mans9841 or @mcegor13 for support.